by fireinthedust » Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:43 pm
That's fair. And I sort of understand the reason to tie things into events: at what stage of a comic does one say "this is the most iconic moment"? Thor has been somewhat static, but X-men tend to go through lots of changes. The original team was over-hauled for Giant-Size X-men, and while that team is fairly static, the other X-books grew the roster substantially by the time the 90s Jim Lee phase hit, plus the 90s cartoon. I could argue that then, and a bit earlier, are the iconic X-men... but it's been 20 years, and there seems to have been a big shift since then in how the stories and the x-universe have developed.
In the comics medium, does it make sense to pick and choose versions of the characters outside of continuity? Would it be like taking 1980s Shadowcat and Vampire Jubilee (now), and missing the point of the two characters as they stand in their respective historical contexts? That crossover would bug me. (or, more concrete: Silver Age Superman mixed with modern age Punisher. Really patchwork combination).
(counter-point: once the dice hit the table, it's no longer continuity. It's impossible to play through the original stories freely, as key narrative choices leading to later events won't be made. Ergo any event book is really more of an event snapshot.)
Also, and with much appreciation, there is the history of the Dragonlance series of modules going through the books. I still collect whichever of those modules I come across.
As well, I do admit, there will likely be loads of fan-made Gambits and Magnetos on these boards. The rules are more simple than M&M, I can whip up my own easily enough, or use someone else's.
So I do get it. Interesting choice, but I get it.
I would buy a roster book or team sourcebook, though.